Conclusiones: Fracturas Intertrocántericas

Consideramos que este simple método, fácilmente reproducible, es de gran utilidad para describir la localización del implante. Si en forma rutinaria realizamos estas mediciones nuestra curva de aprendizaje será rápida y el cirujano cuantificando la distancia punta-apex (TAD) podrá tener un pronóstico sobre la posibilidad de extrusión del implante o de un mal resultado.

La calidad de las radiografías desde el ingreso del paciente hasta la consolidación de la fractura son importantes, en ocasiones hay dificultad con la proyección lateral.

La fractura inestable es muy exigente, se debe buscar una reducción lo más anatómica posible; y el implante debe quedar en una verdadera posición central en las dos proyecciones.

Debemos buscar alternativas que nos permitan intervenir nuestros pacientes en forma más precoz, y buscar una mejor estabilidad en las fracturas inestables, para disminuir las complicaciones.

Nos permitimos sugerir este método de evaluación de la reducción y la posición del implante como parte del seguimiento de las fracturas intertrocántericas de la cadera.

Bibliografía

1. Alffram PA. An epidemiologic study of cervical and trochanteric fractures of the in the urban population: Analysis of 1664 cases with special reference to etiologic factors. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1964; 65: 1-109.
2. Babst R, Renner N, Biedermann M. Clinical results usings the trochanter stabilizing plate: the modular extension of dynamic hip screw for the internal fixation of selectedunstable intertro-chanteric fractures. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 1998; 12: 392-399.
3. Bannister GC, Gibson AGF, Ackroid CE. et al. The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures. A randomized prospective controlled trial. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1990; 254: 242-246.
4. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1995; 77A: 1058-1064.
5. Baumgaertner MR, Solberg BD. Awareness of the tip-apex distance reduce failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1997; 79B: 969-971.
6. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M. et al. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomized prospective comparison of the Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1991; 73B: 330-334.
7. Browner BD, Júpiter JB, Levine AM. et al. Skeletal trauma. First Edition. WB Saunder Company. 1992, 1443-1484.
8. Cavley JA, Seeley DG, Ensrud K. Estrogen replacement therapy and fractures in older women. Ann. Internal Medecine. 1995; 122: 9-16.
9. Clawson DK. Trochanteric fractures treated by sliding screw plate fixation method. J. Trauma. 1994; 4: 737-752.
10. Cleveland M Bosworth DM, Thompson Fr. et al. A ten years analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1959; 41: 1399-1408.
11. Cummings SR, Nentt MC, Brown WS. Risk factors for the hip fracture in the white woman. New England J. of Medicine. 1995; 332: 767-773.
12. Davis RC, Sher JL, Horsman A. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures: Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1989; 73B: 26-31.
13. Doherty JH, Layden JP. Intertrochanteric fractures of the hip treated with the hip compression screw. Analysis of problems. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1979; 141: 184-187.
14. Hardy DCR, Descamps PI, Krallis P. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1998; 80A: 618-630.
15. Hermam CE. Posterior fracture-dislocation of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1961; 48; 1356-1367.
16. Hernigou P, Bernard P. Fractures du col fémur: position de l’implant, effraction articulaire méconnue et ses conséquences. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique. 1994; 80: 503-519.
17. Inman VT. Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1947; 29: 607-619.
18. Keating JF, Robinson CM, Court Brrown CM. The effect of complications after hip fracture on rehabilitation. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993; 75B: 966-976.
19. Kenzora JE, McCarty RE, Lowell JD. Hip fracture mortality: Relation to age, treatment, preoperative illness, time of surgery and complications. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1984; 186: 45-56.
20. Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Rusel TA. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. Instructional Course Lecture. 1995. 44: 227-250.
21. Kyle RF, Wright TM, Burstein AH. Biomechanical analysis of the sliding characyeristics of the compression hip screws. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1980; 62A: 1308-1314.
22. Laros GS, Moore JF. Complications of the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical Orthop. and related Research. 1974; 101: 110-119.
23. Larson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI. Trochanteric fractures. Influence of reduction and implant position on impactation and complications. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1990; 260: 232-241.
24. Madsen JE, Naess L, Kistian A. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: A comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 1998; 12: 249-252.
25. Mainds CC, Newman RJ. Implant failures in patients with proximal fractures of the femur treated with sliding screw device. Injury. 1989; 20: 98-109.
26. Massie WK. Extracapsular fractures of the hip treated by impactation using sliding nail-plate fixation. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1962; 22: 180-202.
27. Mulholland RC, Gunn DR. Sliding screw plate fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. J. Trauma. 1972; 12: 581-591.
28. Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual de fijación interna. Técnica AO. Tercera edición. Springer-Verlag. 1993; 519-534.
29. Parker MJ. Cost benefit analysis of the hip fracture treatment. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1992; 74B: 261-264.
30. Parker MJ. Cutting – out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1992; 74B: 625.
31. Schumpelick W, Jansen PM. A new principle in the operative treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1955; 37: 693-698.
32. Sembo I, Johnel O, Gentz CF. Unstable intertrochantericfractures of the hip. Treatment with Ender pins compared with a compression hip screw. J. Boene and Joint Surgery. 1988; 70A: 1297-1303.
33. Sexson SB, Lehner JT. Factirs affecting hip fracture mortality. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 1987; 1: 298-305.
34. Simpson AH, Varty K, Dodd CA. Sliding hip screws: Models of failure. Injury. 1989; 20: 227-231.
35. Thomas AP. Dynamic hip screws that fail. Injury. 1991; 22: 45-46.
36. Watson JT, Moed BT, Cramer KE. Comparison of the compression hip screw with the Medoff sliding plate for intertrochanteric fractures. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1998; 348: 79-86.
37. White BL, Fisher WD, Laurin CA. Rate of mortality for elderly patients after fracture of the hip in the 1980’s. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1987; 69A: 335-340.
38. Wolfang GL, Bryant MH, O’Neil JP. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clinical Orthop. and Related Research. 1982; 163: 148-158.
39. Zuckerman JD, Sokovron ML, Koval KJ. Post-operative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J. Bone and Joint Surgery. 1995; 77A: 1551-1556.